Theism and epistemic truth-equivalences

Noûs 34 (2):291–301 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper defends the conclusion that every epistemic truth equivalence entails "near theism"--the view that (i) there exists a necessarily existent rational community and (ii) necessarily, there exists an omnisicent community.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
59 (#266,556)

6 months
13 (#182,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Rea
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

Nontraditional Arguments for Theism.Chad A. McIntosh - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (5):1-14.
Naturalism and Moral Realism.Michael C. Rea - 2006 - In Thomas M. Crisp, Matthew Davidson & David Vander Laan (eds.), Knowledge and Reality: Essays in Honor of Alvin Plantinga. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 215-242.
Against Naturalism about Truth.Berit Brogaard - 2016 - In Kelly James Clark (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. pp. 262–276.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references