National Research University “Higher School of Economics” - (Series WP6 “Humanities”) (2013)

Stephen Read
University of St. Andrews
The focus of the paper is a sophism based on the proposition ‘This is Socrates’ found in a short treatise on obligational casus attributed to William Heytesbury. First, the background to the puzzle in Walter Burley’s traditional account of obligations (the responsio antiqua), and the objections and revisions made by Richard Kilvington and Roger Swyneshed, are presented. All six types of obligations described by Burley are outlined, including sit verum, the type used in the sophism. Kilvington and Swyneshed disliked the dynamic nature of the responsio antiqua, and Kilvington proposed a revision to the rules for irrelevant propositions. This allowed him to use a form of reasoning, the “disputational meta-argument”, which is incompatible with Burley’s rules. Heytesbury explicitly rejected Kilvington’s revision and the associated meta-argument. Swyneshed also revised Burley’s account of obligations, formulating the so-called responsio nova, characterised by the apparently surprising thesis that a conjunction can be denied both of whose conjuncts are granted. On closer inspection, however, his account is found to be less radical than first appears.
Keywords Logic  Obligations  William Heytesbury
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:492-492.
Introduction to Mathematical Logic.John Corcoran - 1964 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (2):618-619.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

William Heytesbury.John Longeway - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Consent, Context, and Obligations: A Response to Ciomaga.Steven Weimer - 2014 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 41 (2):233-245.
Rights, Obligations, Priorities.Onora O'Neill - 2010 - Studies in Christian Ethics 23 (2):163-171.
On "Insoluble" Sentences: Chapter One of His Rules for Solving Sophisms.William Heytesbury - 1979 - Toronto, Canada: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.


Added to PP index

Total views
114 ( #102,504 of 2,505,624 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #68,336 of 2,505,624 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes