Naturalism and ontology: A reply to Dale Jacquette

Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):343-357 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In World Without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism, I argued that there is an important sense in which naturalism’s current status as methodological orthodoxy is without rational foundation, and I argued that naturalists must give up two views that many of them are inclined to hold dear—realism about material objects and materialism. In a review recently published in Faith and Philosophy, Dale Jacquette alleges that my arguments in World Without Design are directed mainly against strawmen and that I have neglected to discuss at least one formulation of naturalism that straightforwardly addresses my main objections. In this reply, I show that these and other objections raised by Jacquette are unsound and, in fact, rest on egregious misrepresentations of the book.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
361 (#58,154)

6 months
63 (#79,396)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Rea
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

How Successful is Naturalism?Georg Gasser (ed.) - 2007 - Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Evolutionary naturalism.Roy Wood Sellars - 1922 - New York,: Russell & Russell.
Evolutionary Naturalism.R. W. Sellars - 1923 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 96:453-454.
Peter Forrest, God without the Supernatural: A Defense of Scientific Theism. [REVIEW]Edward L. Schoen - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (2):130-132.

Add more references