Is ‘what is time?’ A good question to ask?

Philosophy 77 (2):193-210 (2002)

Abstract

Dummett in his recent paper in Philosophy replies in the negative to the question, “Is time a continuum of instants?” But Dummett seems to think that this negative reply entails giving an alternative theoretical account; he nowhere canvasses the possibility that there is something amiss with the question. In other words, Dummett thinks that he still has to reply to the question, “What (then) is time?” I offer no answer whatsover to such ‘questions’. Rather, I ask what it could possibly mean to say that time is (e.g.) a continuum of instants (and by extension, whether it can mean anything at all to assert that it isn't). In the course of doing so, I suggest that Dummett's ‘Anti-Realism’ is invariably a form of Realism, just a subtly inconsistent form. Anti-Realism keeps the fundamental metaphysical picture of Realism intact. Anti-Realism still thinks that there is a Reality...settling whether Realism or Anti-Realism is correct! ‘Anti-Realism’ is never anti-Realist enough.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,743

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
115 (#104,554)

6 months
1 (#387,390)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rupert Read
University of East Anglia

References found in this work

Is Time a Continuum of Instants.Michael Dummett - 2000 - Philosophy 75 (4):497-515.

Add more references

Similar books and articles

Kant’s Refutation of Anti-Realism.Edward Blatnik - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:127-146.
Michael Dummett.Benjamin Murphy - 2002 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A Truthmaking Account of Realism and Anti-Realism.Jamin Asay - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (3):373-394.
Anti-Realism and Logic: Truth as Eternal.Neil Tennant - 1987 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Truthmakers, the Past, and the Future.Josh Parsons - 2005 - In Helen Beebee & Julian Dodd (eds.), Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Clarendon Press.
Truth and the Enigma of Knowability.Bernhard Weiss - 2007 - Dialectica 61 (4):521–537.