Argument enkulturacije kao doprinos njegovanju tolerancije

Filozofska Istrazivanja 28 (1):125-136 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Enkulturacija u sociologiji označava uključivanje neke osobe, najčešće djeteta, u obrasce kulture u kojoj se razvija i odrasta. Stoga možemo reći da su i moralni obrasci koje je ta osoba stekla proizišli iz te kulture. Otuda je očevidno da ne postoji jedan univerzalan moral, već se on razlikuje od kulture do kulture. Teza enkulturacije uklapa se u govor o moralnom relativizmu, koji tvrdi da su moralne tvrdnje istinite samo u odnosu na neki standard ili okvir, a ujedno ni taj standard nije isključivo moralno opravdan. Stoga se nameću sljedeća pitanja: smijemo li uopće moralne vrijednosti neke kulture proglasiti nemoralnima?; postoje li granice do kojih bi moral neke kulture bio prihvatljiv i gdje te granice prestaju?; pomaže li stav o prihvaćanju kulture koja ima drukčije moralne vrijednosti njegovanju tolerancije i smanjivanju napetosti među ljudima? U ovoj raspravi nezaobilazni su rezultati istraživanja antropologa koji su se putujući svijetom susretali s kulturama koje niti malo ne nalikuju njihovoj.Enculturation in sociology signifies the inclusion of a person, most often a child, into the patterns of a culture it is developed and grows up in. Thus, we can say that the moral patterns that person acquired are the product of this culture. Hence, it is obvious that there is no universal morality, but that it is different from one culture to another. The thesis of enculturation fits into the discourse about moral relativism, which claims that moral postulates are only true relative to a standard or framework, and that even this standard is not exclusively morally justified. So the following questions arise: can we even announce that the moral values of a culture are amoral; are there limits to which a morality of a culture is acceptable, and where those limits stop; does the attitude about the acceptance of a culture with different moral values helps cherishing of tolerance and the reduction of tensions between people? In this discussion the results of research by anthropologists who met with cultures unlike their own in their travel around the world, are unavoidable

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tjeskoba tolerancije.Vladimir Premec - 2005 - Sarajevo: HKD Napredak Sarajevo.
Aspekti tolerancije i netolerancije.Dragan Jakovljević - 2008 - Theoria: Beograd 51 (3):85-100.
Više od tolerancije: etika za multikulturno društvo.Patrick Giddy - 2012 - Synthesis Philosophica 27 (2):363-376.
Paley’s Argument for Design.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):161-173.
Refutation by Parallel Argument.André Juthe - 2008 - Argumentation 23 (2):133–169.
Rowe's Probabilistic Argument from Evil.Richard Otte - 2002 - Faith and Philosophy 19 (2):147-171.
The Argument of the Beard.Douglas Walton - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
7 (#1,351,854)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references