Having a look at the Bayes Blind Spot

Synthese 198 (4):3801-3832 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Bayes Blind Spot of a Bayesian Agent is, by definition, the set of probability measures on a Boolean σ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sigma $$\end{document}-algebra that are absolutely continuous with respect to the background probability measure of a Bayesian Agent on the algebra and which the Bayesian Agent cannot learn by a single conditionalization no matter what evidence he has about the elements in the Boolean σ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sigma $$\end{document}-algebra. It is shown that if the Boolean algebra is finite, then the Bayes Blind Spot is a very large set: it has the same cardinality as the set of all probability measures ; it has the same measure as the measure of the set of all probability measures ; and is a “fat” set in topological sense in the set of all probability measures taken with its natural topology. Features of the Bayes Blind Spot are determined from the perspective of repeated Bayesian learning when the Boolean algebra is finite. Open problems about the Bayes Blind Spot are formulated in probability spaces with infinite Boolean σ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sigma $$\end{document}-algebras. The results are discussed from the perspective of Bayesianism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is the blind spot blind?C. R. Garvey - 1933 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 (1):83.
A Boolean model of ultrafilters.Thierry Coquand - 1999 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 99 (1-3):231-239.
How do we see in the blind spot?H. Helson - 1934 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 17 (5):763.
Strictly positive measures on Boolean algebras.Mirna Džamonja & Grzegorz Plebanek - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (4):1416-1432.
Hyper-Archimedean BL-algebras are MV-algebras.Esko Turunen - 2007 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 53 (2):170-175.
Minimum‐sized Infinite Partitions of Boolean Algebras.J. Donald Monk - 1996 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 42 (1):537-550.
Iterations of Boolean algebras with measure.Anastasis Kamburelis - 1989 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 29 (1):21-28.
On the Modal Logic of Jeffrey Conditionalization.Zalán Gyenis - 2018 - Logica Universalis 12 (3-4):351-374.
The responsiveness of the blind spot.H. B. Desilva & A. Weber - 1932 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 15 (4):399.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-12

Downloads
42 (#370,011)

6 months
24 (#113,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Miklós Rédei
London School of Economics
Zalan Gyenis
Jagiellonian University

References found in this work

The Logic of Decision.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1965 - New York, NY, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Bayesian Epistemology.Luc Bovens & Stephan Hartmann - 2003 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by Stephan Hartmann.
Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.

View all 26 references / Add more references