Scientific Controversies. A Socio-Historical Perspective on the Advancement of Science

New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. Edited by Lisa C. Chien (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Scientific Controversies, Dominique Raynaud shows how organized debates in the sciences help us establish or verify our knowledge of the world. If debates focus on form, scientific controversies are akin to public debates that can be understood within the framework of theories of conflict. If they focus on content, then such controversies have to do with a specific activity and address the nature of science itself. Understanding the major focus of a scientific controversy is a first step toward understanding these debates and assessing their merits. Controversies of unique socio-historic context, disciplines, and characteristics are examined: Pasteur’s germ theory and Pouchet’s theory of spontaneous generation; vitalism advocated at Montpellier versus experimental medicine in Paris; the science of optics about the propagation of visual rays; the origins of relativism (the Duhem-Quine problem). Touching on the work of Boudon, Popper, and others, Raynaud puts forward an incrementalist theory about the advancement of science through scientific controversies. The debates Raynaud has selected share in common their pivotal importance to the history of the sciences. By understanding the role of controversy, we better understand the functioning of science and the stakes of the contemporary scientific debates.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Al-Samarqandi. Un précurseur de l'analyse des controverses scientifiques.Dominique Raynaud - 2013 - Al-Mukhatabat. Epistemological Approaches to the History of Arabic Sciences 7:8-25.
Scientific controversies: An introduction.P. Machamer, M. Pera & A. Baltas - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 3--17.
On the Cognitive Analysis o f Scientific Controversies.Richard E. Grandy - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 67.
Classifying scientific controversies.Aristides Baltas - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 40.
Patterns of scientific controversies.Philip Kitcher - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 21.
Rhetoric and scientific controversies.Marcello Pera - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-26

Downloads
93 (#169,671)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dominique Raynaud
Université Grenoble Alpes

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references