Why B-Flat Is Not Natural: Reply to Dyck

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (2):187-191 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Unruly Tones: A Reply to Ravasio.John Dyck - 2017 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (2):191-194.
Blurred Lines: Ravasio on “Historically Informed Performance”.Julian Dodd - 2020 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (1):85-90.
Blurred Lines: Ravasio on “Historically Informed Performance”.Julian Dodd - 2020 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (1):85-90.
Covers and (Mere?) Remakes: A Reply to Lee B. Brown.Michael Rings - 2014 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (2):195-199.
Why does literature matter? By Farrell, Frank B.Matthew Turner - 2007 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (3):342–344.
Why Does Literature Matter? by farrell, frank b.Matthew Turner - 2007 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (3):342-344.
Aesthetics and the theory of criticism.Arnold Isenberg - 1973 - Chicago,: University of Chicago Press.
Reply to carrier.Jonathan Gilmore - 1995 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (4):429.
Reply to Taylor.Joel Rudinow - 1995 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (3):316-318.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-27

Downloads
23 (#705,261)

6 months
6 (#587,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matteo Ravasio
Peking University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Natural Sounds and Musical Sounds: A Dual Distinction.John Dyck - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (3):291-302.

Add more references