Philosophia 43 (3):731-739 (2015)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Neo-pragmatists propose that content is determined by social convention. A convention is a coordination problem in which each agent prefers any solution to none, yet has no preference amongst the alternative solutions. This paper argues that the best known theory of convention, David Lewis’, cannot yield a theory of content because it appeals to beliefs and other states that themselves have content. The question then arises whether a theory of convention that does not appeal to states with content can be developed. The idea that a radical enactivist approach to convention based on basic emotions is then tentatively proposed
|
Keywords | Content Radical enactivism Convention Neo-pragmatism |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11406-015-9617-3 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1984 - MIT Press.
Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds Without Content.Daniel D. Hutto & Erik Myin - 2013 - Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
View all 29 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Appeal and Danger of a New Refugee Convention.Luara Ferracioli - 2014 - Social Theory and Practice 40 (1):123-144.
Conventions and Speech Acts.Seumas Roderick Macdonald Miller - 1985 - Dissertation, University of Melbourne (Australia)
Deriving Environmental Rights From the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.Margaret DeMerieux - 2001 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (3):521-561.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-11-04
Total views
27 ( #422,779 of 2,504,601 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,529 of 2,504,601 )
2015-11-04
Total views
27 ( #422,779 of 2,504,601 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,529 of 2,504,601 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads