The patient perspective in health care networks

BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):52 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Health care organization is entering a new age. Focus is increasingly shifting from individual health care institutions to interorganizational collaboration and health care networks. Much hope is set on such networks which have been argued to improve economic efficiency and quality of care. However, this does not automatically mean they are always ethically justified. A relevant question that remains is what ethical obligations or duties one can ascribe to these networks especially because networks involve many risks. Due to their often amorphous and complex structure, collective responsibility and accountability may increase while individual responsibility goes down. We argue that a business ethics approach to ethical obligations for health care networks, is problematic and we propose to opt for a patient perspective. Using the classic four principles of biomedical ethics it is possible to identify specific ethical duties. Based on the principle of justice, health care networks have an ethical duty to provide just and fair access for all patients and to be transparent to patients about how access is regulated. The principle of nonmaleficence implies an obligation to guarantee patient safety, whereas the principle of beneficence implies an obligation for health care networks to guarantee continuity of care in all its dimensions. Finally, the principle of autonomy is translated into a specific obligation to promote and respect patient choice. Networks that fail to meet any of these conditions are suspect and cannot be justified ethically. Faced with daunting challenges, the health care system is changing rapidly. Currently many hopes ride on integrated care and broad health care networks. Such networks are the topic of empirical debate, but more attention should be given to the ethical aspects. Health care networks raise new and pressing ethical issues and we are in need of a framework for assessing how and when such networks are justified.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Enacting Appreciations: Beyond the Patient Perspective.Jeannette Pols - 2005 - Health Care Analysis 13 (3):203-221.
Rethinking Voluntary Euthanasia.Byron J. Stoyles & Sorin Costreie - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (6):jht045.
Primary health care organizations – through a conceptual and a political lens.Joachim P. Sturmberg - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (3):525-529.
Prospects for person‐centred diagnosis in general medicine.Michael Klinkman & Chris van Weel - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (2):365-370.
Towards self-determination in quality of life research: a dialogic approach.Leah McClimans - 2010 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 (1):67-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-05

Downloads
6 (#1,269,929)

6 months
4 (#320,252)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?