The End of 'Small Biology'? Some Thoughts About Biomedicine and Big Science

Big Data and Society:1-6 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In biology—as in other scientific fields—there is a lively opposition between big and small science projects. In this commentary, I try to contextualize this opposition in the field of biomedicine, and I argue that, at least in this context, big science projects should come first.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Biomedicine: An ontological dissection.David Baronov - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):235-254.
Data Interpretation in the Digital Age.Sabina Leonelli - 2014 - Perspectives on Science 22 (3):397-417.
Exemplary reasoning? A comment on theory structure in biomedicine.Arthur L. Caplan - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (1):93-105.
Philosophy of Experimental Biology.Marcel Weber - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
Is biology a provincial science?Ronald Munson - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (4):428-447.
Why science cannot stand alone.Jean Bethke Elshtain - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):161-169.
Classificatory Theory in Biology.Sabina Leonelli - 2013 - Biological Theory 7 (4):338-345.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-27

Downloads
9 (#1,181,695)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?