Nomo(theo)logical Necessity

Faith and Philosophy 4 (4):383-402 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The issues of just what laws of nature are and what makes statements law-like have been more discussed than advanced. After exploring the general area and uncovering some difficulties which, I suspect, make the case even knottier than generally imagined, I argue that certain resources available only to the theist---in particular, counterfactuals of God’s freedom---may provide the materials needed for constructing solutions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,951

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
191 (#135,708)

6 months
17 (#185,650)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Del Ratzsch
Calvin University

Citations of this work

Middle knowledge: The “foreknowledge defense”.David Paul Hunt - 1990 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 28 (1):1 - 24.
Divine Causation.Richard T. McClelland & Robert J. Deltete - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):3-25.
The Nature of Halakha: Philosophical Investigations.Israel J. Cohen - 2024 - Dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references