- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Modeling individual differences in response time and accuracy in numeracy
Cognition 137:115-136 (2015)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Systematic and random sources of variability in perceptual decision-making: Comment on Ratcliff, Voskuilen, and McKoon (2018).Nathan J. Evans, Gabriel Tillman & Eric-Jan Wagenmakers - 2020 - Psychological Review 127 (5):932-944.
Guessing Strategies in Perceptual Identification: A Reply to McKoon and Ratcliff.Leah L. Light & Robert F. Kennison - 1995 - Consciousness and Cognition 5 (4):512-524.
Postscript: Rejoinder to McKoon and Ratcliff (2005).Ken McRae, Mary Hare & Michael K. Tanenhaus - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (4):1031-1031.
Meaning through syntax is insufficient to explain comprehension of sentences with reduced relative clauses: Comment on McKoon and Ratcliff (2003).Ken McRae, Mary Hare & Michael K. Tanenhaus - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (4):1022-1031.
Priming and theories of memory: A reply to Ratcliff and McKoon.Timothy P. McNamara - 1994 - Psychological Review 101 (1):185-187.
Priming is not all bias: Commentary on Ratcliff and McKoon (1997).Jeffrey S. Bowers - 1999 - Psychological Review 106 (3):582-596.
A G McKoon, Gail, 500 Merikle, Philip M., 525 Andrade, Jackie, 562 Goshen-Gottstein, Yonatan, Mori, Monica, 91 117 Graf, Peter, 91 B P. [REVIEW]Anthony G. Greenwald, Bernard J. Baars, John R. Pani, Mahzarin R. Banaji, J. Passchier, William P. Banks, Elizabeth Ligon Bjork, A. E. Bonebakker, Timothy L. Hubbard & Roger Ratcliff - 1996 - Consciousness and Cognition 5:606.
Modeling Nonlinear Conditional Dependence Between Response Time and Accuracy.Maria Bolsinova & Dylan Molenaar - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
Queuing Network Modeling of Reaction Time, Response Accuracy, and Stimulus-Lateralized Readiness Potential Onset Time in a Dual Task.Liu Yili & Wu Changxu - unknown
Disfluency prompts analytic thinking—But not always greater accuracy: Response to.Adam L. Alter, Daniel M. Oppenheimer & Nicholas Epley - 2013 - Cognition 128 (2):252-255.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-09-03
Downloads
33 (#547,331)
6 months
23 (#168,331)
2015-09-03
Downloads
33 (#547,331)
6 months
23 (#168,331)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No calculation necessary: Accessing magnitude through decimals and fractions.John V. Binzak & Edward M. Hubbard - 2020 - Cognition 199 (C):104219.
Uncovering the Structure of Semantic Representations Using a Computational Model of Decision‐Making.Sonia Ramotowska, Shane Steinert-Threlkeld, Leendert van Maanen & Jakub Szymanik - 2023 - Cognitive Science 47 (1):e13234.
The Approximate Number System Acuity Redefined: A Diffusion Model Approach.Joonkoo Park & Jeffrey J. Starns - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Adults with poor reading skills: How lexical knowledge interacts with scores on standardized reading comprehension tests.Gail McKoon & Roger Ratcliff - 2016 - Cognition 146 (C):453-469.
References found in this work
The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model.Marius Usher & James L. McClelland - 2001 - Psychological Review 108 (3):550-592.
The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks.Rafal Bogacz, Eric Brown, Jeff Moehlis, Philip Holmes & Jonathan D. Cohen - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (4):700-765.
A Comparison of Sequential Sampling Models for Two-Choice Reaction Time.Roger Ratcliff & Philip L. Smith - 2004 - Psychological Review 111 (2):333-367.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d5f778f9-vw2sx uwo