Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1819-1846 (2021)

In the past few years, the ethical ramifications of AI technologies have been at the center of intense debates. Considerable attention has been devoted to understanding how a morally responsible practice of data science can be promoted and which values have to shape it. In this context, ethics and moral responsibility have been mainly conceptualized as compliance to widely shared principles. However, several scholars have highlighted the limitations of such a principled approach. Drawing from microethics and the virtue theory tradition, in this paper, we formulate a different approach to ethics in data science which is based on a different conception of “being ethical” and, ultimately, of what it means to promote a morally responsible data science. First, we develop the idea that, rather than only compliance, ethical decision-making consists in using certain moral abilities, which are cultivated by practicing and exercising them in the data science process. An aspect of virtue development that we discuss here is moral attention, which is the ability of data scientists to identify the ethical relevance of their own technical decisions in data science activities. Next, by elaborating on the capability approach, we define a technical act as ethically relevant when it impacts one or more of the basic human capabilities of data subjects. Therefore, rather than “applying ethics”, data scientists should cultivate ethics as a form of reflection on how technical choices and ethical impacts shape one another. Finally, we show how this microethical framework concretely works, by dissecting the ethical dimension of the technical procedures involved in data understanding and preparation of electronic health records.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s13347-021-00490-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,636
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Intelligent Virtue.Julia Annas - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Commodities and Capabilities.Amartya Sen - 1985 - Oxford University Press India.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Cultivating Virtue: A Review Essay.Ryan West - 2019 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 16 (3):359-370.
How Virtue Fits Within Business Ethics.J. Thomas Whetstone - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (2):101 - 114.
Virtue, Privacy and Self-Determination.Giannis Stamatellos - 2011 - International Journal of Cyber Ethics in Education 1 (4):35-41.
Teaching the Virtues: Justifications and Recommendations.Candace C. Gauthier - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (3):339-346.
Teaching the Virtues: Justifications and Recommendations.Candace C. Gauthier - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (3):339-.
Scripting Situations in Moral Education.Deborah S. Mower - 2010 - Teaching Ethics 11 (1):93-106.
The Formation of Pastors, Parishioners, and Problems. Kotva Jr - 1997 - The Annual of the Society of Christian Ethics 17:271-290.
The Virtue Approach to Moral Education: Some Conceptual Clarifications.Jan W. Steutel - 1997 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 31 (3):395–407.
Ethics Beyond Moral Theory.Timothy Chappell - 2009 - Philosophical Investigations 32 (3):206-243.


Added to PP index

Total views
13 ( #753,384 of 2,462,239 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #56,509 of 2,462,239 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes