A Sociohistorical Critique Of Naturalistic Theories Of Color Perception

Journal of Mind and Behavior 10 (4):361-372 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Naturalistic experiments of color perception are critically evaluated. The review concludes that they fail to confirm a natural determination of color perception. Rather than demonstrating universal sensitivity to focal colors, the experiments actually yielded enormous cultural variation in response. This variation is interpreted as supporting a sociohistorical psychological explanation of color perception

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The empirical basis of color perception.R. Beau Lotto & Dale Purves - 2002 - Consciousness and Cognition 11 (4):609-629.
Color Experience: A Semantic Theory.Mohan Matthen - 2010 - In Jonathan Cohen & Mohan Matthen (eds.), Color Ontology and Color Science. MIT Press. pp. 67--90.
Color objectivism and color projectivism.Edward Wilson Averill & Allan Hazlett - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (6):751 - 765.
The location problem for color subjectivism.Peter W. Ross - 2001 - Consciousness and Cognition 10 (1):42-58.
Color objectivism and color pluralism.Vivian Mizrahi - 2006 - Dialectica 60 (3):283-306.
Naturalized perception without information.John Dilworth - 2004 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 25 (4):349-368.
Transparency vs. revelation in color perception.John Campbell - 2005 - Philosophical Topics 33 (1):105-115.
Are color experiences representational?Todd Ganson - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):1-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-04

Downloads
16 (#883,649)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?