Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (4-5):487-499 (2016)

Authors
Abstract
International criminal law is dedicated to the battle against impunity. However, the concept of impunity lacks clarity. Providing that clarity also reveals challenges for the current state and future prospects of the project of ICL, which this article frames in cosmopolitan terms. The ‘impunity norm’ of ICL is generally presented in a deontic form. It holds that impunity for perpetrators of international crimes is a wrong so profound that states and international bodies have a pro tanto duty to prosecute and punish perpetrators, a duty that cannot be overridden by considerations of cost, including the costs of infringing on the traditionally understood legal sovereignty of states. This deontic reading of the impunity norm is difficult to justify, a fact linked to the waning fortunes of ICL over the past several years. If ICL is to reverse this trend, the impunity norm’s strongly deontic reading should be replaced by a version derived from deliberative principles
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0191453715625714
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Impunity and Hope.Tony Reeves - 2019 - Ratio Juris 32 (4):415-438.
The Costs and Benefits of Prosecution: A Contractualist Justification of Amnesty.Robert Patrick Whelan - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-23.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Two Cheers for the Impunity Norm.Max Pensky - 2016 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (4-5):487-499.
Universal Jurisdiction and International Criminal Law.Jovana Davidovic - 2015 - In Chad Flanders & Zach Hoskins (eds.), The New Philosophy of Criminal Law. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 113-130.
Colonial and Postcolonial State and Development in Africa.Mueni Wa Muiu - 2010 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (4):1311-1338.
The Duty to Forgive Repentant Wrongdoers.Espen Gamlund - 2010 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (5):651-671.
Unity with Impunity.Catherine Lord - 1967 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26 (1):103-106.
Norms of Higher Order.G. H. von Wright - 1983 - Studia Logica 42 (2-3):119 - 127.
Impunity's Psychological Effects: Its Ethical Consequences.D. R. Kordon - 1991 - Journal of Medical Ethics 17 (Suppl):29-32.
Norm Performatives and Deontic Logic.Rosja Mastop - 2011 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (2):83-105.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-04-22

Total views
14 ( #734,864 of 2,517,922 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,045 of 2,517,922 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes