- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Must a metaphysical relativist be a truth relativist?
Philosophia 22 (1-2):75-85 (1993)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Holism, realism, and truth: how to be an anti‐relativist and not give up on heidegger – a debate with Christopher Norris.Jeff Malpas - 2004 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (3):339 – 356.
Indexicality, intensionality, and relativist post-semantics.Stefano Predelli - 2012 - Synthese 184 (2):121-136.
Trumping Assessments and the Aristotelian Future.Crispin Wright - 2009 - Synthese 166 (2):309 - 331.
The Radical Nature of Margolis’ Relativism.B. Richard Beatch - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:81-93.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
105 (#163,695)
6 months
6 (#512,819)
2009-01-28
Downloads
105 (#163,695)
6 months
6 (#512,819)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Metaphysical relativism and the disquotational view of reference.Bradley Armour-Garb - 1999 - Philosophia 27 (1-2):225-239.
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo