Computers Are Syntax All the Way Down: Reply to Bozşahin

Minds and Machines 29 (2):227-237 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A response to a recent critique by Cem Bozşahin of the theory of syntactic semantics as it applies to Helen Keller, and some applications of the theory to the philosophy of computer science.

Similar books and articles

Syntax, Semantics, and Computer Programs.William J. Rapaport - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 33 (2):309-321.
Helen Keller Was Never in a Chinese Room.Jason Ford - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (1):57-72.
Semiotic Systems, Computers, and the Mind: How Cognition Could Be Computing.William J. Rapaport - 2012 - International Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems 2 (1):32-71.
Consciousness and the computer: A reply to Henley.Benny Shanon - 1991 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 12 (3):371-375.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-21

Downloads
466 (#39,608)

6 months
128 (#26,790)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William J. Rapaport
State University of New York, Buffalo

Citations of this work

Do Computers "Have Syntax, But No Semantics"?Jaroslav Peregrin - 2021 - Minds and Machines 31 (2):305-321.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The symbol grounding problem.Stevan Harnad - 1990 - Physica D 42:335-346.
What an Algorithm Is.Robin K. Hill - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (1):35-59.
Tom swift and his procedural grandmother.Jerry A. Fodor - 1978 - Cognition 6 (September):229-47.
The Causal Relevance of Content to Computation.Michael Rescorla - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (1):173-208.

View all 21 references / Add more references