The Place of Bioethics in Philosophy: Toward a Mutually Constructive Integration

American Journal of Bioethics 22 (12):54-56 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The critique to which Blumenthal-Barby et al. (2022), respond—that philosophy has little left to do in bioethics—reflects a common assumption that normative theorizing first generates general moral...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,271

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The swap of integral and limit in constructive mathematics.Rudolf Taschner - 2010 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 56 (5):533-540.
A Place for Ethics? A Place for Advocacy?Robin L. Pierce - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):17 - 18.
What’s the Point of Philosophical Bioethics?Iain Brassington - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (1):20-30.
Integration Under Negotiation.Daniel Z. Buchman, Wayne Skinner & Judy Illes - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (3):W1-W2.
Domain-generality and the relative pronoun.José Luis Bermudez - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):676-677.
Gleason's theorem has a constructive proof.Fred Richman - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (4):425-431.
Towards a Mutually Beneficial Integration of History and Philosophy of Science: The Case of Jean Perrin.Klodian Coko - 2019 - In Emily Herring, Kevin Matthew Jones, Konstantin S. Kiprijanov & Laura M. Sellers (eds.), The Past, Present, and Future of Integrated History and Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge. pp. 186-209.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-24

Downloads
17 (#838,752)

6 months
13 (#181,228)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pierce Randall
United States Naval Academy

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations