On the equivalence of strong and weak validity of rule schemes in the two-valued propositional calculus

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 11 (2):249-253 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theorem counting.M. G. Beavers - 1994 - Topoi 13 (1):61-65.
On weak and strong validity of rules for the propositional calculus.V. Frederick Rickey - 1971 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 12 (1):115-116.
M-valued sub-system of (m+n)-valued propositional calculus.Tzu-Hua Hoo - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (3):177-181.
Three-valued logics in modal logic.Barteld Kooi & Allard Tamminga - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (5):1061-1072.
Consensus and normative validity.Harald Grimen - 1997 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):47 – 61.
What is an inference rule?Ronald Fagin, Joseph Y. Halpern & Moshe Y. Vardi - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (3):1018-1045.
Quantum logical calculi and lattice structures.E. -W. Stachow - 1978 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):347 - 386.
Axiom schemes for m-valued propositional calculi.J. B. Rosser & A. R. Turquette - 1945 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 10 (3):61-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
14 (#965,243)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references