The role of judgment and orientation in hermeneutics

Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (1-2):29-50 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper attempts to reassess the role of judgment in hermeneutics. Beyond considering the different modes of judgment involved in interpretation, a topology of contexts that can orient understanding is proposed, starting with the way Kant distinguishes among a field, a territory and a domain. Other relevant contexts are also considered. One of the main tasks of hermeneutics is to be able to coordinate various interdisciplinary contexts

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Must Nietzsche be Incorporated into Hermeneutics? Some Reasons for a Little Resistance.Jean Grondin - 2010 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 2 (3):105-122.
Tradition and orientation in hermeneutics.Rudolf A. Makkreel - 1986 - Research in Phenomenology 16 (1):73-85.
Clinical judgment and the rationality of the human sciences.Eugenie Gatens-Robinson - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (2):167-178.
Descartes on the will in judgment.Lex Newman - 2007 - In Janet Broughton & John Carriero (eds.), A Companion to Descartes. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 334-352.
The role of assent in judgment: a Thomistic study.Francis Martin Tyrrell - 1948 - Wasgington,: Catholic Univ. of America Press.
Interpretation and the Problem of Domination: Paul Ricoeur's Hermeneutics.Zeus Leonardo - 2003 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 22 (5):329-350.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
50 (#310,395)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rudolf Makkreel
Emory University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations