On the Incoherence Objection to Rule-Utilitarianism

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (4):857-876 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For a long time many philosophers felt the incoherence objection was a decisive objection to rule-consequentialism, but that position has recently become less secure, because Brad Hooker has offered a clever new way for rule-consequentialists to avoid the incoherence objection. Hooker’s response defeats traditional forms of the incoherence objection, but this paper argues that another version of the problem remains. Several possible solutions fail. One other does not, but it introduces other problems into the theory. I conclude that the new incoherence objection still poses a major challenge to rule-consequentialism, though not for the reasons usually assumed. It does not constitute a fatal objection to rule-consequentialism but instead highlights a theoretical drawback in the theory which must be taken into account during a more holistic evaluation of rule-consequentialism and its rivals.

Similar books and articles

The Incoherence Objection in Moral Theory.Eric Wiland - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (3):279-284.
Act and Rule Consequentialism: A Synthesis.Jussi Suikkanen - forthcoming - Moral Philosophy and Politics.
II*—Rule-Consequentialism, Incoherence, Fairness1.Brad Hooker - 1995 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95 (1):19-36.
Rule-consequentialism's dilemma.Iain Law - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):263-276.
Rule-Consequentialism, Incoherence, Fairness.Brad Hooker - 1995 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:19 - 35.
Mill, rule utilitarianism, and the incoherence objection.Dale E. Miller - 2010 - In Ben Eggleston, Dale Miller & David Weinstein (eds.), John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life. , US: Oxford University Press. pp. 94.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-03

Downloads
1,065 (#13,627)

6 months
168 (#24,897)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex Rajczi
Claremont McKenna College

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.
Normative Ethics.Shelly Kagan - 1998 - Westview Press.
Contemporary political philosophy: an introduction.Will Kymlicka - 1990 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 38 references / Add more references