Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (2):338-348 (2004)

Authors
Alex Rajczi
Claremont McKenna College
Abstract
An axiom of medical research ethics is that a protocol is moral only if it has a “favorable risk-benefit ratio”. This axiom is usually interpreted in the following way: a medical research protocol is moral only if it has a positive expected value -- that is, if it is likely to do more good (to both subjects and society) than harm. I argue that, thus interpreted, the axiom has two problems. First, it is unusable, because it requires us to know more about the potential outcomes of research than we ever could. Second, it is false, because it conflicts with the so-called “soft paternalist” principles of liberal democracy. In place of this flawed rule I propose a new way of making risk-benefit assessments, one that does comport with the principles of liberalism. I argue that a protocol is moral only if it would be entered into by competent subjects who are informed about the protocol. The new rule this eschews all pseudo-utilitarian calculation about the protocol’s likely harms and benefits.
Keywords medical research  informed consent  risk-benefit ratio
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2004.tb00480.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Liberty.John Stuart Mill - 1859 - Broadview Press.
Cost-Value Analysis in Health Care: Making Sense Out of QALYs.Erik Nord - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (202):132-133.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Framework for Risk-Benefit Evaluations in Biomedical Research.Wendler Annette Rid David - 2011 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (2):141-179.
Limits to Research Risks.F. G. Miller & S. Joffe - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (7):445-449.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Understanding Risks and Benefits in Research on Reproductive Genetic Technologies.Janet Malek - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (4):339 – 358.
Is Payment a Benefit?Alan Wertheimer - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (2):105-116.
Challenging Research on Human Subjects: Justice and Uncompensated Harms.Stephen Napier - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (1):29-51.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-31

Total views
341 ( #29,677 of 2,498,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #59,177 of 2,498,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes