A Populist Argument for Same-Sex Marriage

The Monist 91 (3-4):475-505 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper argues that same-sex marriage ought to be legalized. The argument is ecumenical and appeals only to basic principles of liberal government. Specifically, the paper argues that if the government is offering an opportunity to one group, then it may not withhold the opportunity from another on the ground that the people receiving it are immoral or that their receipt of the opportunity would spread immoral messages. The only acceptable ground is that the group’s receipt would cause wrongful harm to third-parties that would outweigh the benefits. Same-sex marriage would not do so, and thus it must to be allowed. As part of this argument, the paper addresses the popular stamp-of-approval and defense-of-marriage arguments against same-sex marriage.

Similar books and articles

Brief Refutations of Some Common Arguments against Same-Sex Marriage.Benjamin A. Gorman - 2004 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Issues 4 (1):13-15.
Same-Sex Marriage: Not a Threat to Marriage or Children.Timothy F. Murphy - 2011 - Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (3):288-304.
Same-Sex Marriage and Equality.Reginald Williams - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):589-595.
Same-sex marriage and the regulation of language.Andrew Stivers & Andrew Valls - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):237-253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-06

Downloads
1,535 (#6,552)

6 months
173 (#15,580)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex Rajczi
Claremont McKenna College

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references