Cheating at coin tossing

Abstract

Arguments for A "fair" coin has probability 1/2. There is no physical probability attached to the coin, we can cheat on each toss (by sufficient control). My aim: The coin toss is fine-grained deterministic, but coarsgrained random

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Using biased coins as oracles.Toby Ord & Tien D. Kieu - 2009 - International Journal of Unconventional Computing 5:253-265.
The eternal Coin: A puzzle about self-locating conditional credence.Cian Dorr - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):189-205.
Remarks on "Random Sequences".Branden Fitelson & Daniel Osherson - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Logic 12 (1).
Determinism and Chance from a Humean Perspective.Roman Frigg & Carl Hoefer - 2010 - In Friedrich Stadler, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao González, Hartmann J., Uebel Stephan, Weber Thomas & Marcel (eds.), The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science. Springer. pp. 351--72.
Even Risk-Averters may Love Risk.Alfred Müller & Marco Scarsini - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (1):81-99.
Should the probabilities count?Katharina Berndt Rasmussen - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 159 (2):205-218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-20

Downloads
49 (#308,026)

6 months
1 (#1,428,112)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Raidl Eric
University Tübingen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references