Unruly Words: A Study of Vague Language

Oxford, England: Oup Usa (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Unruly Words, Diana Raffman advances a new theory of vagueness which, unlike previous accounts, is genuinely semantic while preserving bivalence. According to this new approach, called the multiple range theory, vagueness consists essentially in a term's being applicable in multiple arbitrarily different, but equally competent, ways, even when contextual factors are fixed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,191

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Unruly Words: A Study of Vague Language. [REVIEW]Jonas Åkerman - 2014 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 201403.
Précis of Unruly Words: A Study of Vague Language.Diana Raffman - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (2):452-456.
Vagueness and Semantic Methodology.Mark Sainsbury - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (2):475-482.
Contextualism and the Principle of Tolerance.Paula Sweeney - 2014 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 90 (1):289-306.
Granular Partitions and Vagueness.Thomas Bittner & Barry Smith - 2001 - In Barry Smith & Christopher Welty, Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS). ACM Press. pp. 309-320.
Vagueness and Law.Timothy Endicott - 2011 - In Giuseppina Ronzitti, Vagueness: A Guide. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag. pp. 171--191.
Bertrand Russell on vagueness.Marvin Kohl - 1969 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 47 (1):31-41.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-03

Downloads
120 (#194,342)

6 months
14 (#278,350)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Diana Raffman
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

Vagueness.Roy Sorensen - 2012 - In Ed Zalta, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Replies to Bacon, Eklund, and Greenough on Replacing Truth.Kevin Scharp - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (4):422-475.
Sorites paradox.Dominic Hyde - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references