Donor Conception Disclosure: Directive or Non-Directive Counselling?

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (3):369-379 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is widely agreed among health professionals that couples using donor insemination should be offered counselling on the topic of donor conception disclosure. However, it is clear from the literature that there has long been a lack of agreement about which counselling approach should be used in this case: a directive or a non-directive approach. In this paper we investigate which approach is ethically justifiable by balancing the two underlying principles of autonomy and beneficence. To overrule one principle in favour of another, six conditions should be fulfilled. We analyse the arguments in favour of the beneficence principle, and consequently, a directive approach. This analysis shows that two conditions are not met; the principle of autonomy should not be overridden. Therefore, at this moment, a directive counselling approach on donor conception disclosure cannot be ethically justified.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,659

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Emotion-focused counselling in action.Robert Elliott - 2021 - Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-28

Downloads
36 (#441,654)

6 months
17 (#204,437)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?