Authors
Bartosz Michal Radomski
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Dunja Šešelja
Eindhoven University of Technology
Abstract
The history of the research on peptic ulcer disease is characterized by a premature abandonment of the bacterial hypothesis, which subsequently had its comeback, leading to the discovery of Helicobacter pylori—the major cause of the disease. In this paper we examine the received view on this case, according to which the primary reason for the abandonment of the bacterial hypothesis in the mid-twentieth century was a large-scale study by a prominent gastroenterologist Palmer, which suggested no bacteria could be found in the human stomach. To this end, we employ the method of digital textual analysis and study the literature on the etiology of PUD published in the decade prior to Palmer’s article. Our findings suggest that the bacterial hypothesis had already been abandoned before the publication of Palmer’s paper, which challenges the widely held view that his study played a crucial role in the development of this episode. In view of this result, we argue that the PUD case does not illustrate harmful effects of a high degree of information flow, as it has frequently been claimed in the literature on network epistemology. Moreover, we argue that alternative examples of harmful effects of a high degree of information flow may be hard to find in the history of science.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s40656-021-00466-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Fate of Knowledge.Helen E. Longino - 2001 - Princeton University Press.
Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism.Hasok Chang - 2012 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science.
How Scientists Explain Disease.Paul Thagard - 1999 - Princeton University Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Pursuit and Inquisitive Reasons.Will Fleisher - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 94:17-30.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How Scientists Explain Disease.Paul Thagard - 1999 - Princeton University Press.
The Rise of Peptic Ulcer, 1900-1950.Gerald N. Grob - 2003 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 46 (4):550-566.
The Physiology and Treatment of Peptic Ulcer Edited by J. Garrott Allen.Charles F. Code - 1960 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 3 (3):433-433.
Human Dignity and Rights Beyond Death.Kam Lun Hon - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (10):651-651.
On the Relevance and Importance of the Notion of Disease.Lennart Nordenfelt - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine: An International Journal for the Philosophy and Methodology of Medical Research and Practice 14 (1):15-26.
Medical Fact and Ulcer Disease: A Study in Scientific Controversy Resolution.Mark Cherry - 2002 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24 (2):249 - 273.
Ulcers and Bacteria I: Discovery and Acceptance.Paul Thagard - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 29 (1):107-136.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-11-04

Total views
5 ( #1,203,408 of 2,506,503 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,244 of 2,506,503 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes