Between-group attack and defence in an ecological setting: Insights from nonhuman animals

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Attempts to understand the fundamental forces shaping conflict between attacking and defending groups can be hampered by a narrow focus on humans and reductionist, oversimplified modelling. Further progress depends on recognising the striking parallels in between-group conflict across the animal kingdom, harnessing the power of experimental tests in nonhuman species and modelling the eco-evolutionary feedbacks that drive attack and defence.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Saving Nonhumans: Drawing the Threads of a Movement Together.Andrew Woodhall & Gabriel Garmendia da Trindade - 2016 - In Gabriel Garmendia da Trindade & Andrew Woodhall (eds.), Intervention or Protest: Acting for Nonhuman Animals. Wilmington, Delaware, USA: Vernon Press. pp. 23-55.
Nonhuman animal property: Reconciling environmentalism and animal rights.John Hadley - 2005 - Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (3):305–315.
Nonhuman alterities.Roberto Marchesini - 2016 - Angelaki 21 (1):161-172.
Egalitarianism and Animals.Oscar Horta - 2016 - Between the Species 19 (1):108-144.
On Due Recognition of Animals Used in Research.Joel Marks - 2011 - Journal of Animal Ethics 1 (1):6-8.
Journeys toward an Authentic Self.Pete Porter - 2009 - Society and Animals 17 (4):368-375.
Autonomous Pigs.David Judd & James Rocha - 2017 - Ethics and the Environment 22 (1):1-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-14

Downloads
9 (#1,181,695)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations