Advocacy and Genuine Autonomy: The Lawyer's Role When the Client Has a Right to Do Wrong

South Texas Law Review 40 (1):255-67 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Stephen L. Pepper argues that lawyers and clients often act together in ways that their moral convictions would prevent them from acting individually. In an attempt to address this problem, I explore the nature of the attorney's responsibility to help her client reach autonomous decisions. To do this, I review the work of some prominent medical ethicists on a parallel to Pepper's problem in doctor-patient relationships.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is it Morally Wrong to Defend Unjust Causes as a Lawyer?Eduardo Rivera-López - 2014 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (2):177-189.
Defending the Right To Do Wrong.Ori J. Herstein - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (3):343-365.
Autonomy, consent and the law.Sheila McLean - 2010 - New York, N.Y.: Routledge-Cavendish.
The Concept of Autonomy and Its Role in Kantian Ethics.Iain Brassington - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (2):166-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-31

Downloads
215 (#90,312)

6 months
57 (#74,349)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Linda Radzik
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references