Expectations regarding cognitive enhancement create substantial challenges

Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (8):469-470 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A recent discussion on cognitive enhancers has caused some controversy in the ethics and neuroscience fields by coming out in favour of making neuropharmaceuticals with enhancing properties available for general consumption. We highlight in this brief commentary why concerns regarding efficacy and safety, demands on resources, and public health are substantive enough to warrant serious reconsideration before pharmaceutical performance enhancement can be widely supported

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
Genetic enhancement: Plan now to act later.Maxwell J. Mehlman - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):77-82.
An aristotelian approach to cognitive enhancement.Lubomira Radoilska - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (3):365–375.
Moral enhancement and freedom.John Harris - 2010 - Bioethics 25 (2):102-111.
Cognitive disability in a society of equals.Jonathan Wolff - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (3-4):402-415.
Moral enhancement.Thomas Douglas - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):228-245.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
41 (#369,691)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?