Remarks on the Gödelian Anti-Mechanist Arguments

Studia Semiotyczne 34 (1):267–278 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Certain selected issues around the Gödelian anti-mechanist arguments which have received less attention are discussed.

Similar books and articles

McCall’s Gödelian Argument is Invalid.Panu Raatikainen - 2002 - Facta Philosophica 4 (1):167-69.
Proving that the Mind Is Not a Machine?Johannes Stern - 2018 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):81-90.
Minds, Machines and Gödel.J. R. Lucas - 1961 - Etica E Politica 5 (1):1.
On the philosophical relevance of Gödel's incompleteness theorems.Panu Raatikainen - 2005 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 59 (4):513-534.
On some much maligned remarks of Wittgenstein on gödel.Charles Sayward - 2001 - Philosophical Investigations 24 (3):262–270.
Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems and Physics.Newton C. A. Da Costa - 2011 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 15 (3):453-459.
Pruss's ontological arguments.Graham Oppy - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (3):355-363.
Gödel's incompleteness theorems and computer science.Roman Murawski - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):123-135.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-13

Downloads
677 (#23,375)

6 months
224 (#10,424)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Panu Raatikainen
Tampere University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What is Mathematical Truth?Hilary Putnam - 1975 - In Mathematics, Matter and Method. Cambridge University Press. pp. 60--78.
Minds, Machines and Gödel.J. R. Lucas - 1961 - Etica E Politica 5 (1):1.
Classical recursion theory: the theory of functions and sets of natural numbers.Piergiorgio Odifreddi - 1989 - New York, N.Y., USA: Sole distributors for the USA and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..

View all 22 references / Add more references