Discrete tense logic with infinitary inference rules and systematic frame constants: A Hilbert-style axiomatization [Book Review]

Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (1):45 - 100 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper deals with the problem of axiomatizing a system T1 of discrete tense logic, where one thinks of time as the set Z of all the integers together with the operations +1 ("immediate successor") and-1 ("immediate predecessor"). T1 is like the Segerberg-Sundholm system WI in working with so-called infinitary inference ruldes; on the other hand, it differs from W I with respect to (i) proof-theoretical setting, (ii) presence of past tense operators and a "now" operator, and, most importantly, with respect to (iii) the presence in T1 of so-called systematic frame constants, which are meant to hold at exactly one point in a temporal structure and to enable us to express the irreflexivity of such structures. Those frame constants will be seen to play a paramount role in our axiomatization of T1

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
57 (#275,172)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Natural deduction: a proof-theoretical study.Dag Prawitz - 1965 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.
Past, present and future.Arthur N. Prior - 1967 - Oxford,: Clarendon P..
Past, Present and Future.Arthur N. Prior - 1967 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Introduction to logic.Patrick Suppes - 1957 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.
An essay in classical modal logic.Krister Segerberg - 1971 - Uppsala,: Filosofiska föreningen och Filosofiska institutionen vid Uppsala universitet.

View all 32 references / Add more references