Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (4):815-829 (2016)

Jonathan Quong
University of Southern California
In this paper, I offer two arguments in support of the proposition that there are sometimes agent-relative prerogatives to impose harm on nonliable persons. The first argument begins with a famous case where most people intuitively agree it is permissible to perform an act that results in an innocent person’s death, and where there is no liability-based or consequentialist justification for acting. I show that this case is relevantly analogous to a case involving the intentional imposition of lethal defensive harm on a nonliable person. In the final part of the paper, I provide a second, independent, argument in support of the proposition that there are agent-relative permissions to foreseeably harm or kill nonliable people under certain conditions.
Keywords Agent-relative prerogatives  Defensive harm  Liability  Nonresponsible threats  Self-defense  Violinist
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11572-014-9345-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Defense of Abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
Killing in Self‐Defense.Jonathan Quong - 2009 - Ethics 119 (3):507-537.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Authorization and The Morality of War.Seth Lazar - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (2):211-226.
Necessity Historically Considered.Daniel Schwartz - 2020 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 17 (6):591-605.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can an Act-Consequentialist Theory Be Agent Relative?Douglas W. Portmore - 2001 - American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (4):363-77.
Moral Failure and Agent-Relative Prerogatives.Dale Dorsey - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research 30 (Supplement):309-319.
A Practical Account of Self-Defence.Helen Frowe - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (3):245-272.
Agent Neutrality is the Exclusive Feature of Consequentialism.Desheng Zong - 2000 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):676-693.
Responsibility and Compensation Rights.Peter Vallentyne - 2009 - In Stephen De Wijze, Matthew H. Kramer & Ian Carter (eds.), Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice: Themes and Challenges. Routledge.
The Moral Status of Nonresponsible Threats.Jason Hanna - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):19-32.
Defending Double Effect.Alison Hills - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 116 (2):133-152.


Added to PP index

Total views
126 ( #93,849 of 2,517,922 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #206,126 of 2,517,922 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes