Philosophical Studies 59 (1):79-90 (1990)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00368392 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Introduction.Ruth Chang - 1997 - In Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press. pp. 1-34.
How You Can Help, Without Making a Difference.Julia Nefsky - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (11):2743-2767.
View all 64 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Intransitive Preferences, Vagueness, and the Structure of Procrastination.Duncan MacIntosh - 2010 - In Chrisoula Andreou & Mark D. White (eds.), The Thief of Time. Oxford University Press.
A Simple Solution to the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever.Brian Rabern & Landon Rabern - 2008 - Analysis 68 (2):105-112.
How to Solve the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever in Two Questions.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2010 - Analysis 70 (1):39-44.
Introduction: Puzzle Plots.Warren Buckland - 2009 - In Puzzle Films: Complex Storytelling in Contemporary Cinema. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 1--12.
Why the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever Cannot Be Solved in Less Than Three Questions.Gregory Wheeler & Pedro Barahona - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):493-503.
A Pragmatic Solution to Ostertag’s Puzzle.Philip Atkins - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (2):359-365.
A Note on the Relationship Between Mates' Puzzle and Frege's Puzzle.M. A. Moffett - 2002 - Journal of Semantics 19 (2):159-166.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
292 ( #37,052 of 2,518,149 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #272,129 of 2,518,149 )
2009-01-28
Total views
292 ( #37,052 of 2,518,149 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #272,129 of 2,518,149 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
