Giving or taking: the role of dispositional power motivation and positive affect in profit maximization [Book Review]
Mind and Society 8 (1):109-126 (2009)
AbstractSocio-economic decisions are commonly explained by rational cost versus benefit considerations, whereas person variables have not much been considered. The present study aimed at investigating the degree to which dispositional power motivation and affective states predict socio-economic decisions. The power motive was assessed both indirectly and directly using a TAT-like picture test and a power motive self-report, respectively. After 9 months, 62 students completed an affect rating and performed on a money allocation task. We hypothesized and confirmed that dispositional power should be associated with a tendency to maximize oneâs profit but to care less about another partyâs profit. Additionally, positive affect showed effects in the same direction. The results are discussed with respect to a motivational approach explaining socio-economic behaviour
Similar books and articles
The Mandevillean Conceit and the Profit-Motive.Tony Lynch & Adrian Walsh - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (1):43-63.
Profit Motive.Joakim Sandberg - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
An Examination of the Contribution of Dispositional Affect on Ethical Lapses.D. Jordan Lowe & Philip M. J. Reckers - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 111 (2):179-193.
Incentive Motivation: Just Extraversion?Marvin Zuckerman - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):539-540.
Machiavellianism, Profit, and the Dimensions of Ethical Judgment: A Study of Impact. [REVIEW]Donald H. Schepers - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 42 (4):339 - 352.
When MR = MC: Ethical Efficiencies in Valuing and Pricing. [REVIEW]Patrick Primeaux & John Stieber - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 18 (2):201 - 211.
Profit Maximization: The Ethical Mandate of Business. [REVIEW]Patrick Primeaux & John Stieber - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (4):287 - 294.
Reward Event Systems: Reconceptualizing the Explanatory Roles of Motivation, Desire and Pleasure.Carolyn R. Morillo - 1992 - Philosophical Psychology 5 (1):7-32.
What Fundamental Properties Suffice to Account for the Manifest World? Powerful Structure.Sharon R. Ford - 2010 - Dissertation, University of Queensland
A General Theory of Gender Stratification.Rae Lesser Blumberg - 1984 - Sociological Theory 2:23-101.
The Effect of Firm Profit Versus Personal Economic Well Being on the Level of Ethical Responses Given by Managers.James J. Hoffman, Grantham Couch & Bruce T. Lamont - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (3):239-244.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
“Economic Man” in Cross-Cultural Perspective: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies.Joseph Henrich, Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colin Camerer, Ernst Fehr, Herbert Gintis, Richard McElreath, Michael Alvard, Abigail Barr, Jean Ensminger, Natalie Smith Henrich, Kim Hill, Francisco Gil-White, Michael Gurven, Frank W. Marlowe & John Q. Patton - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):795-815.
On the Reality of Cognitive Illusions.Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (3):582-591.
Behavior: The Control of Perception.William T. Powers - 1973 - Benchmark Publications, Incorporated.
Power, Approach, and Inhibition.Dacher Keltner, Deborah H. Gruenfeld & Cameron Anderson - 2003 - Psychological Review 110 (2):265-284.