Journal of the History of Biology 50 (3):609-643 (2017)

Authors
Aleta Quinn
University of Idaho
Abstract
Early nineteenth century systematists sought to describe what they called the Natural System or the Natural Classification. In the nineteenth century, there was no agreement about the basis of observed patterns of similarity between organisms. What did these systematists think they were doing, when they named taxa, proposed relationships between taxa, and arranged taxa into representational schemes? In this paper I explicate Charles Frederic Girard’s (1822–1895) theory and method of systematics. A student of Louis Agassiz, and subsequently (1850–1858) a collaborator with Spencer Baird, Girard claimed that natural classificatory methods do not presuppose either a special creationist or an evolutionary theory of the natural world. The natural system, in Girard’s view, comprises three distinct ways in which organisms can be related to each other. Girard analyzed these relationships, and justified his classificatory methodology, by appeal to his embryological and physiological work. Girard offers an explicit theoretical answer to the question, what characters are evidence for natural classificatory hypotheses? I show that the challenge of simultaneously depicting the three distinct types of relationship led Girard to add a third dimension to his classificatory diagrams.
Keywords Systematics  Natural Classification  Evolution  Affinity  Diagrams  Girard
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10739-016-9447-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,078
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Whewell on Classification and Consilience.Aleta Quinn - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 1 (64):65-74.
When is a Cladist Not a Cladist?Aleta Quinn - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (4):581-598.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Representation in Western Music.Joshua S. Walden (ed.) - 2013 - Cambridge University Press.
Girard and the Spaces of Apocalyptic.Cyril O'regan - 2012 - Modern Theology 28 (1):112-140.
The One by Whom Scandal Comes.Malcolm B. DeBevoise (ed.) - 2014 - Michigan State University Press.
Notes on Contributors. [REVIEW]Xiang Chen & Bernard R. Goldstein - 2005 - Perspectives on Science 13 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-01-05

Total views
7 ( #1,063,755 of 2,498,789 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,542 of 2,498,789 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes