Hume’s practically epistemic conclusions?

Philosophical Studies 170 (3):501-524 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The inoffensive title of Section 1.4.7 of Hume’s Treatise of Human Nature, ‘Conclusion of this Book’, belies the convoluted treatment of scepticism contained within. It is notoriously difficult to decipher Hume’s considered response to scepticism in this section, or whether he even has one. In recent years, however, one line of interpretation has gained popularity in the literature. The ‘usefulness and agreeableness reading’ (henceforth U&A) interprets Hume as arguing in THN 1.4.7 that our beliefs and/or epistemic policies are justified via their usefulness and agreeableness to the self and others; proponents include Ardal (in Livingston & King (eds.) Hume: a re-evaluation, 1976), Kail (in: Frasca-Spada & Kail (eds.) Impressions of Hume, 2005), McCormick (Hume Stud 31:1, 2005), Owen (Hume’s reason, 1999), and Ridge (Hume Stud 29:2, 2003), while Schafer (Philosophers, forthcoming) also defends an interpretation along these lines. In this paper, I will argue that although U&A has textual merit, it struggles to maintain a substantive distinction between epistemic and moral justification—a distinction that Hume insists on. I then attempt to carve out the logical space for there being a distinctly epistemic notion of justification founded on usefulness and agreeableness. However, I find that such an account is problematic for two reasons: first, it cannot take advantage of the textual support for U&A; secondly, it is incompatible with other features of the text

Similar books and articles

Owen on Humean Reason.Don Garrett - 2000 - Hume Studies 26 (2):291-303.
Hume's reason.David Owen - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Hume Is Not A Skeptic about Induction.Xinli Wang - 2001 - Diálogos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 36 (78):41-54.
Hume's Scepticism and Realism.Jani Hakkarainen - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):283-309.
Was Hume a Humean?Elijah Millgram - 1995 - Hume Studies 21 (1):75-94.


Added to PP

270 (#55,003)

6 months
82 (#20,008)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hsueh Qu
National University of Singapore

Citations of this work

Hume’s Doxastic Involuntarism.Hsueh Qu - 2017 - Mind 126 (501):53-92.
Hume's Internalist Epistemology in EHU 12.Hsueh Qu - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (3):517-539.
Laying Down Hume's Law.Hsueh Qu - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (1):24-46.
Prescription, Description, and Hume's Experimental Method.Hsueh Qu - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (2):279-301.
Excuses for Hume's Skepticism.Yuval Avnur - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (2):264-306.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary.David Hume - 1875 - Indianapolis: Liberty Press. Edited by Eugene F. Miller.
Cognition and commitment in Hume's philosophy.Don Garrett - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Hume's reason.David Owen - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Cognition and Commitment in Hume’s Philosophy.Don Garrett - 1997 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):191-196.
Stability and justification in Hume's Treatise.Louis E. Loeb - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references