Hume’s practically epistemic conclusions?

Philosophical Studies 170 (3):501-524 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The inoffensive title of Section 1.4.7 of Hume’s Treatise of Human Nature, ‘Conclusion of this Book’, belies the convoluted treatment of scepticism contained within. It is notoriously difficult to decipher Hume’s considered response to scepticism in this section, or whether he even has one. In recent years, however, one line of interpretation has gained popularity in the literature. The ‘usefulness and agreeableness reading’ (henceforth U&A) interprets Hume as arguing in THN 1.4.7 that our beliefs and/or epistemic policies are justified via their usefulness and agreeableness to the self and others; proponents include Ardal (in Livingston & King (eds.) Hume: a re-evaluation, 1976), Kail (in: Frasca-Spada & Kail (eds.) Impressions of Hume, 2005), McCormick (Hume Stud 31:1, 2005), Owen (Hume’s reason, 1999), and Ridge (Hume Stud 29:2, 2003), while Schafer (Philosophers, forthcoming) also defends an interpretation along these lines. In this paper, I will argue that although U&A has textual merit, it struggles to maintain a substantive distinction between epistemic and moral justification—a distinction that Hume insists on. I then attempt to carve out the logical space for there being a distinctly epistemic notion of justification founded on usefulness and agreeableness. However, I find that such an account is problematic for two reasons: first, it cannot take advantage of the textual support for U&A; secondly, it is incompatible with other features of the text

Similar books and articles

Hume’s Deontological Response to Scepticism.Hsueh Qu - 2019 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 6.
Hume's Constitutivist Response to Scepticism.Taro Okamura - 2024 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 11.
Is Hume a Perspectivalist?Sam Zahn - forthcoming - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy.
Hume's scepticism regarding reason.John Asquith - 2016 - Dissertation, Oxford Brookes University
Hume’s Impression/Idea Distinction.David Landy - 2006 - Hume Studies 32 (1):119-139.
Précis of Hume's True Scepticism.Donald C. Ainslie - 2019 - Hume Studies 45 (1):95-99.
Humeanism and the epistemology of testimony.Dan O’Brien - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):2647-2669.


Added to PP

454 (#46,784)

6 months
114 (#47,936)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hsueh Qu
National University of Singapore

Citations of this work

Hume’s Doxastic Involuntarism.Hsueh Qu - 2017 - Mind 126 (501):53-92.
Is Hume a Perspectivalist?Sam Zahn - forthcoming - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy.
Hume's Internalist Epistemology in EHU 12.Hsueh Qu - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (3):517-539.
Prescription, Description, and Hume's Experimental Method.Hsueh Qu - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (2):279-301.
Laying Down Hume's Law.Hsueh Qu - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (1):24-46.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary.David Hume - 1875 - Indianapolis: Liberty Press. Edited by Eugene F. Miller.
Cognition and commitment in Hume's philosophy.Don Garrett - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Hume.Don Garrett - 2015 - New York: Routledge.
Hume's reason.David Owen - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Cognition and Commitment in Hume’s Philosophy.Don Garrett - 1997 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):191-196.

View all 23 references / Add more references