Journal of Business Ethics 127 (3):683-694 (2015)

The role of a corporation is often debated as a mutually exclusive choice between economic responsibility to shareholders and social responsibility to society. An evolving viewpoint embraces an integrated approach focused on long-term value creation for shareholders which benefits other stakeholders. Maximizing long-term shareholder value as a corporate objective can be compatible with stakeholder theory when an enlightened shareholder maximization strategy is embraced. Firms implementing an enlightened shareholder maximization strategy are expected to make decisions and use resources which achieve long-term value-creating outcomes. However, critics of enlightened shareholder maximization as a corporate goal contend this strategy conflicts with maximizing shareholder value. This study explores whether firms which embrace a balanced enlightened shareholder maximization strategy indeed create long-term value which does not sacrifice shareholder wealth
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2070-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,290
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Stakeholder Legitimacy.Robert Phillips - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1):25-41.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ethical Aspects of Investor Behavior.Pietra Rivoli - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (4):265 - 277.
Shareholder Theory and Kant’s ‘Duty of Beneficence’.Samuel Mansell - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3):583-599.
A Moral and Economic Defense of Executive Compensation.John Dobson - 2011 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 30 (1-2):59-70.
Tinged Shareholder Theory: Or What's so Special About Stakeholders?Geoff Moore - 1999 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 8 (2):117–127.
10.5840/Jbee20118113.Dennis Proffitt - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 1 (1):181-198.
Balancing Ethics and Shareholder Returns: The Case of Google in China.Dennis Proffitt - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 8 (1):181-198.


Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #337,323 of 2,519,270 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,748 of 2,519,270 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes