In András Szigeti & Matthew Talbert (eds.), Morality and Agency: Themes from Bernard Williams. Oxford University Press (forthcoming)

Authors
Matthieu Queloz
Oxford University
Abstract
Far from being indiscriminately critical of the ideas he associated with the morality system, Bernard Williams offered vindicatory explanations of its crucial building blocks, such as the moral/non-moral distinction, the idea of obligation, the voluntary/involuntary distinction, and the practice of blame. The rationale for these concessive moves, I argue, is that understanding what these ideas do for us when they are not in the service of the system is just as important to leading us out of the system as the critique of that system. I then show how regarding the aspiration to shelter life from luck as the system’s organizing ambition explains why the system elaborates and combines these building blocks in the way it does. Finally, I argue that the ultimate problem with the resulting construction is its frictionless purity. It robs valuable concepts of their grip on the world we live in, and, by insisting on purity from contingency, threatens to issue in nihilism about value and scepticism about agency.
Keywords Bernard Williams  Morality System  Kant  Responsibility  Action Theory  The Will  Voluntariness  Blame  Moral/Non-Moral Distinction  Obligation  Purity
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Ethical Project.Philip Kitcher - 2011 - Harvard University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Luck and The Unfairness of Morality.Robert J. Hartman - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (12):3179-3197.
Moral Luck From Bernard Williams’ Point of View.Zahra Khazai Tamaddon & Fatemeh - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 10 (18):189-218.
Ethical Ideals, Nonrational Forces: Melville's Critique of Morality.Thomas Britten Hove - 1998 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Responsibility, Naturalism and ‘the Morality System'.Paul Russell - 2013 - In David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility. New York, IA 50238, USA: pp. 184-204.
System Relativism.Charles Sayward - 1988 - Ratio 1 (2):163-175.
The Definition of Morality: Threading the Needle.Andrés Luco - 2014 - Social Theory and Practice 40 (3):361-387.
Morality: An Introduction to Ethics.Bernard Williams - 1993 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
A Cybernetic Theory of Morality and Moral Autonomy.Jean Chambers - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):177-192.
Obligation, Character, and Commitment.Stan van Hooft - 1988 - Philosophy 63 (245):345-.
Williams, B.-Making Sense of Humanity.G. Cullity - 1998 - Philosophical Books 39:91-104.
The Morality System with and Without God.Ton van den Beld - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (4):383-399.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-06-06

Total views
829 ( #7,490 of 2,463,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
139 ( #4,265 of 2,463,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes