A gene’s eye view of Darwinian populations: Review of Peter Godfrey-Smith's Darwininan populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009
Biology and Philosophy 26 (6):905-913 (2011)
AbstractBiologists and philosophers differ on whether selection should be analyzed at the level of the gene or of the individual. In Peter Godfrey-Smith’s book, Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection, he argues that individuals can be good members of Darwinian populations, whereas genes rarely can. I take issue with parts of this view, and suggest that Godfrey-Smith’s scheme for thinking about Darwinian populations is also applicable to populations of genes
Similar books and articles
Review of Godfrey-Smith's Darwinian populations and natural selection. [REVIEW]Anya Plutynski - 2010 - Philosophical Books 51 (2):83-101.
Cancer cells and adaptive explanations.Pierre-Luc Germain - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (6):785-810.
Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection, by Peter Godfrey-Smith.T. Pradeu - 2011 - Mind 120 (479):863-870.
Darwinian populations and natural selection * by Peter Godfrey Smith.R. M. Burian - 2010 - Analysis 70 (3):599-601.
Homunculi rule: Reflections on Darwinian populations and natural selection by Peter Godfrey Smith: Oxford University Press, 2009.Daniel C. Dennett - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (4):475-488.
Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. [REVIEW]Massimo Pigliucci - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (8).
Darwinism About Darwinism: Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection Peter Godfrey-Smith Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. [REVIEW]Joeri Witteveen - 2009 - Biological Theory 4 (2):207-213.
Darwinian reductionism, or, how to stop worrying and love molecular biology – Alex rosenbergDarwinian populations and natural selection – Peter Godfrey-Smith.Michael Ruse - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):204-208.
Book Review Peter Godfrey-Smith , Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection . Oxford: Oxford University Press (2009), viii+207 pp., $55.00 (cloth). [REVIEW]Cailin O'Connor - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (4):589-593.
Agents and acacias: replies to Dennett, Sterelny, and Queller.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (4):501-515.
Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection.Gry Oftedal - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):333-336.
Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. [REVIEW]Grant Ramsey, Hope Hollocher, Agustin Fuentes, Charles H. Pence & Edwin Siu - 2010 - Quarterly Review of Biology 85 (4):499-500.
Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection.Peter Gildenhuys - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):192-195.
Selection does operate primarily on Genes : In defense of the Gene as the unit of selection.Carmen Sapienza - 2008 - In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 127--140.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The sociobiology of genes: the gene’s eye view as a unifying behavioural-ecological framework for biological evolution.Alexis De Tiège, Yves Van de Peer, Johan Braeckman & Koen B. Tanghe - 2017 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (1):6.