Kant and Demystification of Ethics and Religion

Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 11 (21):175-190 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kant's demystification is meant to put away any metaphysical and revealed elements from ethics and religion. Kant, fulfilling this, first argues that metaphysical questions of reason, from theoretical aspect, have no certain answers. In practical reason, he establishes his moral foundations, based on own human being without any referring to metaphysical bases. In fact, Kant places human being as the base, legislator and finally the end of ethics, so that the totality of morality is depended on itself him/her and there is no moral reality out of our humanly understanding. Kant, then, by confirming the necessity of rational religion, believes that the age of revealed religions have been expired, since they were belonged to the childhood age of human being’s reason, while in Kant’s rational religion, this is human being’s subjective intellect that defines the nature and function of God. Therefore, for Kant’s moral and rational religion, there is no credibility for affairs like miracles, blessings and prayers, since they indicate religious misguidance. In Kant’s rational pure religion, the religion is relied on human being’s pure reason in which his/her reason is the only criterion of religious beliefs. Therefore, for Kant, religion means recognizing our duties as divine judgments, and that such religion pertains to our mundane life not for worshiping God in order to get his satisfaction or benefitting his grace. In short, Kant’s religion and morality are totally depended on our humanly and earthy rationality and understanding, and that there is no mystery out of our humanly willing. So the mysteries that are claimed by revealed religions are meaningless, since our reason, itself, determines the nature, function and virtues of God, moral axioms and religious beliefs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Paradox of Inwardness in Kant and Kierkegaard.Stephen R. Palmquist - 2016 - Journal of Religious Ethics 44 (4):738-751.
Kant on Religious Moral Education.Dennis Vanden Auweele - 2015 - Kantian Review 20 (3):373-394.
Die Wandlungen in Kants Gotteslehre.Eckart Förster - 1998 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 52 (3):341 - 362.
For the Love of God: Kant on Grace.Dennis Vanden Auweele - 2014 - International Philosophical Quarterly 54 (2):175-190.
Naturalism and Realism in Kant's Ethics.Frederick Rauscher - 2015 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered.Alexander von Schoenborn - 1991 - Philosophy and Theology 6 (2):101-116.
Grace and favor in Kant’s ethical explication of religion.James DiCenso - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78 (1):29-51.
Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered.Alexander von Schoenborn - 1991 - Philosophy and Theology 6 (2):101-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-20

Downloads
6 (#1,353,689)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Religion Within the Bounds of Bare Reason.Immanuel Kant - 2009 - Hackett Publishing Company.
To the Editor of Philosophy.F. C. Copleston - 1944 - Philosophy 19 (73):190-191.

Add more references