Mou Zongsan’s view of interpreting Confucianism by “moral autonomy”

Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):345-362 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Mou Zongsan uses the highest moral principle “autonomy” to interpret Confucius’ benevolence and Mencius’ “inherent benevolence and righteousness”, focuses on the self-rule of the will. It does not do any harm to Mencius’ learning, on the contrary, it is conducive to the communication between Chinese and Western philosophies. If we stick to Kant’s moral self autonomy and apply it to interpreting Zhu Xi’s moral theory, similarly we will discover the implications of Zhu Xi’s “autonomy” in his moral learning. Therefore, it is inappropriate for Mou Zongsan to say that Zhu Xi’s ethics belongs to the autonomous one.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,446

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defending the Right To Do Wrong.Ori J. Herstein - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (3):343-365.
Mou Zongsan san xi lun lun heng.Zebo Yang - 2006 - Shanghai Shi: Fu dan da xue chu ban she.
The many faces of autonomy.Diego Gracia - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):57-64.


Added to PP

102 (#154,721)

6 months
3 (#428,620)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations