Heythrop Journal 37 (2):125–138 (1996)

From inception to extinction, objective criteria regarding the defining characteristics of "personhood" are sought to justify responsibility. But, when we relate to others, what do we actually relate to? In The Ethical Significance of Illeity, L vinas's concept of illeity is used to argue that the responsibility owed to others flows not from an ability to comprehend the defining characteristics of "personhood" but from the fact that persons are ultimately "neutral" and beyond disclosure. Ethics should not be dominated by knowledge; rather, the ethical relationship with the other should guide the progress of understanding. Philosophy is the wisdom of love at the service of love
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2265.1996.tb01015.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,079
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Corporate Legal Responsibility: A Levinasian Perspective.Conceição Soares - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3):545-553.
Derechos humanos como derechos Del otro en lévinas.Edgar Antonio López - 2010 - Cuadernos de Filosofía Latinoamericana 31 (103).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
49 ( #231,148 of 2,506,082 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,082 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes