Freedom and the Dynamics of the Self and the 'Other'; Re-constructing the Debate Between Tagore and Gandhi
Sophia 52 (2):335-357 (2013)
AbstractTagore and Gandhi shared a relationship across 26 years. They argued about many things including the means for the attainment of swaraj/freedom. In terms of this central concern with the nature of freedom they came fairly close to an issue that has perhaps dominated the (European) Enlightenment. For the Enlightenment has sought to clarify what is meant by individual freedom and attempted to secure such freedom to the individual. This article argues that the Tagore-Gandhi debate can perhaps be reconstructed around the issue of freedom and the collective. Gandhi was able to employ the idea of collective action with conceptual and practical ease. He seemed to have felt no tension between individual freedom and the notion of the collective of which an individual becomes a part in his/her attempt to deal with the contending ‘other’ and secure his /her freedom/swaraj. To understand Tagore’s opposition to the Gandhian idea of swaraj this article draws a philosophical parallel between Tagore and Kant on individual freedom as primarily the freedom to reason. Tagore’s argument seemed to have centered on the insight that the location of the individual in a collective hypostatized self in order to protect his or her freedom from ‘others’ reaffirms the self other divide. The insider-outsider exclusionary dynamics that are generated not only consolidate such distinctions as external to (and outside of) the collective self, but they also initiate internal dynamics that create the ‘silenced insider.’
Similar books and articles
The freedom of collective agents.Frank Hindriks - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (2):165–183.
Educational Visions from Two Continents: What Tagore adds to the Deweyan perspective.Francis A. Samuel - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (10):1161-1174.
Involuntary antipsychotic medication and freedom of thought.Mari Stenlund - 2011 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 4 (2):31-33.
Educational Ideas and Ideals of Gandhi and Tagore: A Comparative Study.Rā. Su Maṇi - 1995 - New Book Society of India.
Gandhi on nonviolence in the context of enlightenment, rationality and globalization.R. P. Singh - unknown
Freedom as Motion: Thomas Hobbes and the Images of Liberalism.Leslie D. Feldman - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:229-243.
Adorno on Kant, Freedom and Determinism.Timo Jütten - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):548-574.
External Freedom in Kant’s Rechtslehre: Political, Metaphysical.Jennifer K. Uleman - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):578–601.
What we desire, what we have reason to desire, whatever we might desire: Mill and Sen on the value of opportunity.Robert Sugden - 2006 - Utilitas 18 (1):33-51.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?Immanuel Kant - 1996 - In James Schmidt (ed.), What is Enlightenment?: Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions. University of California Press.
Transformative Constitutionalism and the Case of Religion.Stephen Macedo - 1998 - Political Theory 26 (1):56-80.
Nonviolence as a civic virtue: Gandhi and reformed liberalism. [REVIEW]Nicholas F. Gier - 2003 - International Journal of Hindu Studies 7 (1-3):75-97.
It All Depends... on How One Understands Liberalism.Richard E. Flathman - 1998 - Political Theory 26 (1):81-84.