Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1331-1352 (2015)

Authors
Abstract
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of anonymous surveys asking scientists whether they ever committed various forms of plagiarism. From May to December 2011 we searched 35 bibliographic databases, five grey literature databases and hand searched nine journals for potentially relevant studies. We included surveys that asked scientists if, in a given recall period, they had committed or knew of a colleague who committed plagiarism, and from each survey extracted the proportion of those who reported at least one case. Studies that focused on academic plagiarism were excluded. Literature searches returned 12,460 titles from which 17 relevant survey studies were identified. Meta-analysis of studies reporting committed and witnessed plagiarism yielded a pooled estimate of, respectively, 1.7 % and 30 %. Basic methodological factors, including sample size, year of survey, delivery method and whether survey questions were explicit rather than indirect made a significant difference on survey results. Even after controlling for these methodological factors, between-study differences in admission rates were significantly above those expected by sampling error alone and remained largely unexplained. Despite several limitations of the data and of this meta-analysis, we draw three robust conclusions: The rate at which scientists report knowing a colleague who committed plagiarism is higher than for data fabrication and falsification; The rate at which scientists report knowing a colleague who committed plagiarism is correlated to that of fabrication and falsification; The rate at which scientists admit having committed either form of misconduct in surveys has declined over time
Keywords Plagiarism  Research misconduct  Research integrity  Data fabrication  Data falsification  Survey methodology
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,959
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Plagiarism: Words and Ideas.Mathieu Bouville - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):311-322.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Self-Plagiarism or Appropriate Textual Re-Use?Tracey Bretag & Saadia Mahmud - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (3):193-205.
Electronic Media, Creativity and Plagiarism.Naveed Imran - 2010 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 40 (4):25-44.
The Instructional Challenges of Student Plagiarism.Erika Löfström & Pauliina Kupila - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (3):231-242.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-10-29

Total views
27 ( #422,825 of 2,504,809 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,809 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes