Lies of Omission and Commission, Providing and Withholding Treatment, Local and Global Autonomy – There Are Reasons for Clinical Ethicists to Attend to All of These Distinctions

American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):43-45 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Meyers argues that clinical ethicists should sometimes be active participants in the deception of patients and families, whether that involves lies of omission or commission. I shall...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deception and the Clinical Ethicist.Christopher Meyers - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):4-12.
Conflict in the Pediatric Setting: Clinical Judgment vs. Parental Autonomy.Amnon Goldworth - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (1):36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-05

Downloads
21 (#715,461)

6 months
11 (#226,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Pugh
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

Deception and the Clinical Ethicist.Christopher Meyers - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):4-12.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Virtues and Vices.Philippa Foot - 1983 - Noûs 17 (1):117-121.
Deception and the Clinical Ethicist.Christopher Meyers - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):4-12.
Virtues and Vices.Phillipa Foot - 1997 - In Thomas L. Carson & Paul K. Moser (eds.), Morality and the Good Life. Oup Usa.
Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics.Jonathan Pugh - 2020 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Virtues and Vices.Philippa Foot - 1997 - In Roger Crisp & Michael Slote (eds.), Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references