Confronting the International Order: Changes in US Foreign Policy from the Perspective of American Power Elites

International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal 23 (1):11-31 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present the most important voices on the role of the US in the international order during Donald Trump’s presidency in the debate held in the Foreign Affairs. The authors assume that Foreign Affairs expresses the opinions of the most crucial organisation bringing together the elites of American foreign affairs – the Council on Foreign Relations. The paper proposes a hypothesis according to which there is a difference of opinion due to the adopted theoretical perspective regarding Trump’s role in the destruction of the liberal international order among the American power elites, even though they agree that the ideological conflict between democratic and authoritarian countries around the world is escalating.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ignorant armies: The state, the public, and the making of foreign policy.Earl C. Ravenal - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):327-374.
Americom Exceptionalism and US Fortign Policy.Li-xin Wang - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:10-17.
A Survey Of The Foreign Policy Of The Palaeologl.Zhi-Qiang Chen - 1997 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:39-46.
The carnegie poll on values in american foreign policy.Robert J. Myers - 1989 - Ethics and International Affairs 3:297–301.
The Global Class Action and Its Alternatives.Zachary D. Clopton - 2018 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 19 (1):125-150.
A New Alliance against the US? Sino-Russian Relations in Response to Trump’s Redefined Foreign Policy Priorities.Przemysław Ciborek - 2019 - International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal 23 (1):149-159.
Coercion, Justification, and Inequality: Defending Global Egalitarianism.Simon Caney - 2015 - Ethics and International Affairs 29 (3):277-288.
On Effect of Private International Law in Contemporary International Relations.Jian Sun - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 4:118-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-20

Downloads
7 (#1,310,999)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references