Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (11):737-738 (2014)

Authors
Jonathan Pugh
Oxford University
Abstract
In his discussion of in vitrogametogenesis, Rob Sparrow claims that an ethical barrier to development of this technology is that many jurisdictions currently prohibit the practice of creating embryos solely for the purpose of research. However, he suggests that this ethical barrier will soon be eroded, in view of the fact that in vitro gametogenesis could serve as a powerful new technology to overcome infertility. In this commentary, I argue that Sparrow is being overly optimistic in his analysis here. I claim that the debate over so-called compromise positions in the human embryonic stem cell debate suggests that the purpose of the research for which a research embryo is created is unlikely to be considered as having any significant bearing on the moral permissibility of the practice for those who oppose it. Even though in vitro gametogenesis could serve as a powerful new technology to overcome infertility, I argue that opponents of the practice of creating embryos solely for research purposes would still view the creation of research embryos that the development of in vitro gametogenesis would require, as being incompatible with affording the embryo proper moral respect. I conclude by suggesting that Sparrow's analysis of the potential benefits of in vitro gametogenesis provides us with further reasons to scrutinise the unconvincing arguments that are often cited in favour of prohibiting the practice of creating embryos solely for research purposes
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2013-101660
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research and the Discarded Embryo Argument.Mark Moller - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (2):131-145.
In Vitro Eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (11):725-731.
The Embryo in Relationships: A French Debate on Stem Cell Research.Giovanni Maio - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (5):583 – 602.
Abortion, Embryonic Stem Cell Research, and Waste.David A. Jensen - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):27-41.
A Heideggerian Defense of Therapeutic Cloning.Fredrik Svenaeus - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (1):31-62.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
28 ( #408,277 of 2,506,352 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,352 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes