Who Are We Without Trauma?

Voices in Bioethics 6 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In using brain stimulation technology to suppress an individual’s fear response to a traumatic memory, we are effectively altering that individual’s identity. In this article, I argue that until we learn more, such technology should be available only to patients with objectively debilitating fear responses who give their informed consent. First, I provide an overview of how the technology works. Second, I analyze the artificial, natural, and clinical changes in memory, and explores the ethical concerns associated with altering an individual’s identity. I conclude by asserting that the benefits of brain stimulation technology outweigh the concerns if the proper administrative procedure is followed.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A defence of quasi-memory.Rebecca Roache - 2006 - Philosophy 81 (2):323-355.
Memory Enhancement: The Issues We Should Not Forget About.Laura Cabrera - 2011 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 22 (1):97-109.
The Sacralization of Memory.Barbara A. Misztal - 2004 - European Journal of Social Theory 7 (1):67-84.
The limited right to alter memory.Adam J. Kolber - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):658-659.
Propranolol, post-traumatic stress disorder and narrative identity.J. Bell - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):e23-e23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-10

Downloads
118 (#148,399)

6 months
41 (#91,823)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references